Rehabilitative Orbital Decompression for Graves' Orbitopathy: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial | oneGRAVESvoice
Global Search
Global Search

Trusted Resources: Evidence & Education

Scientific literature and patient education texts

Back to Evidence & Education / Scientific Articles

Rehabilitative Orbital Decompression for Graves’ Orbitopathy: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

key information

source: Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

year: 2018

authors: Sellari-Franceschini S, Rocchi R, Marinò M, Bajraktari A, Mazzi B, Fiacchini G, Lepri P, Dallan I, Vitti P, Marcocci C

summary/abstract:

Purpose:
Orbital decompression (OD) is a consolidated procedure for the treatment of exophthalmos in Graves’ orbitopathy (GO). The efficacy of the various procedures remains unclear due to the variability of the techniques used. To address this issue, we performed a randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of two surgical techniques. The primary endpoint was the reduction in proptosis. Secondary aims were the risk of post-operative diplopia (POD) in primary gaze and other surgical complications.

Patients:
38 patients (76 orbits) affected with GO were enrolled and randomized into single lateral decompression (LD) (n = 19) or balanced medial plus lateral wall decompression (MLD) (n = 19). Following surgery, patients were seen for a follow-up ophthalmological evaluation at 6 months. Pre-operative diplopia in secondary gaze was present in 13/38 patients (34.2%, 8/19 treated with LD and 5/19 treated with MLD).

Results:
The reduction of exophthalmos was greater in patients treated with MLD (5.1 ± 1.5 mm, range 2-8 mm) than in those treated with LD (3.5 ± 1.3 mm, range 1-6.5 mm) (p = 0.01). The overall incidence of POD in primary gaze was 5/38 (13.2%) and all of these patients had pre-operative diplopia in secondary gaze (5/13, 38.5%, vs patients with no pre-operative diplopia p = 0.005). Two of 19 patients (10.5%) treated with LD and 3/19 (15.8%) treated with MLD, developed POD in primary gaze, with no statistical difference between the two techniques.

Conclusion:
MLD provides a better result in terms of proptosis reduction compared to LD. The two techniques used here appear to have a similar safety profile in terms of POD. Pre-operative diplopia in the secondary gaze remains a major risk factor for development of POD.

organization: Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Italy

DOI: 10.1007/s40618-018-0847-7

read more

Related Content

To improve your experience on this site, we use cookies. This includes cookies essential for the basic functioning of our website, cookies for analytics purposes, and cookies enabling us to personalize site content. By clicking on 'Accept' or any content on this site, you agree that cookies can be placed. You may adjust your browser's cookie settings to suit your preferences. More Information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close

Powered by

Brought to you by

Supported through an independent
educational grant by

© 2022 rareLife solutions Inc.