Randomized Controlled Trial of Rituximab in Patients With Graves' Orbitopathy - oneGRAVESvoice

Trusted Resources: Evidence & Education

Scientific literature and patient education texts

Back to Evidence & Education / Scientific Articles

Randomized Controlled Trial of Rituximab in Patients With Graves’ Orbitopathy

key information

source: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

year: 2015

authors: Stan MN, Garrity JA, Carranza Leon BG, Prabin T, Bradley EA, Bahn RS

summary/abstract:

Context:
Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is a potentially sight-threatening disease for which available medical therapy is not uniformly successful. Multiple case series suggest that rituximab (RTX) may be effective therapy for GO patients.

Objective:
To determine the efficacy of RTX in GO.

Design:
It is a prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting:
The study was conducted at a large academic private practice.

Patients:
Twenty five patients with active moderate to severe GO were enrolled, and 21 completed the study to the primary endpoint.

Interventions:
Two RTX infusions (1000 mg each) or two saline infusions were given 2 weeks apart.

Main Outcome Measures:
The primary endpoint was a reduction in clinical activity score (CAS) assessed as a continuum and separately as improvement by ≥ 2 points at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included success and failure rates, proportions showing clinically significant improvement in proptosis, lid fissure width, diplopia score, lagophthalmos and disease severity, and changes in those parameters, orbital fat/ muscle volume and quality-of-life.

Results:
The treatment groups were similar in all parameters at baseline. The last observation was carried forward if the patient discontinued prematurely. No differences were found in the proportions of patients showing CAS improvement at 24 weeks (25% placebo; 31% RTX, P = .75) or in CAS decrease from baseline to 24 or 52 weeks [mean 1.5 points (1.8 SD) placebo; 1.2 (2 SD) RTX at 24 weeks, P = .73]. Similarly, there were no differences between groups in any of the secondary endpoints at either 24 or 52 weeks. There were four adverse events (AE) in 3/12 placebo patients and 11 AE in 8/13 RTX-treated patients; 5/6 moderate or severe AE occurred in the RTX group.

Conclusion:
RTX offered no additional benefit over placebo to our patients with active and moderate to severe GO and carried with it non-negligible adverse effects.

organization: Mayo Clinic, USA

DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-2572

read more full text

To improve your experience on this site, we use cookies. This includes cookies essential for the basic functioning of our website, cookies for analytics purposes, and cookies enabling us to personalize site content. By clicking on 'Accept' or any content on this site, you agree that cookies can be placed. You may adjust your browser's cookie settings to suit your preferences. More Information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close